Gloria Swanson by Stanlaws |
A year later
and, strangely, around the same time Stanlaws first criticized the appearance of
some of films most popular beauties, he retired from directing to live in an
artist’s community in Woodstock. He returned to California two decades later
but never again resumed his career in the film industry. He died in sad
circumstances on May 20, 1957 from a fire that engulfed his Los Angeles home.
Investigators reported found the fire had started from a cigarette that Stanlaws
was smoking before absentmindedly falling asleep. However,
Stanlaws legend encompasses more than his successes as an artist or director.
During his short time in Hollywood, Stanlaws, famously spoke out twice about
the real state of popular film star’s beauty. In 1923 and 1933, he made
scandalous claims about the physical imperfections of many leading ladies. I highlight the word ladies as Stanlaws did not feel the
need to comment on the appearance of the male stars. The Montreal Gazette called him a “bold” and a “brave” man for publicising
his views.
Olive Thomas by Stanlaws |
Read his
controversial comments from 1923, published in the Syracuse Herald, January
7, 19 23:
·
“Betty
Blythe is muscle bound in her hips. She has horse nostrils . Betty
Compson’s hips are too prominent and are muscle-bound. ”
·
“Viola
Dana has a big nose that is heavy at the end; jawbones are too wide and chin
too prominent. ”
·
“Bebe
Daniels figure is good, but she keeps her mouth open too much. Pauline
Fredrick’s eyelids are too heavy .”
·
“Dorothy
Gish sisters have imperfect noses, Lips too large, also. Lillian
Gish as imperfect as Dorothy .”
·
“Phyllis
Haver has a face like a diamond with too many facets. It is over-modeled. ”
·
“Lila
Lee’s figure is stocky and face is too flat. Shirley Mason’s faults are
deep-set eyes and horse nostrils. ”
·
“Mary
Miles Minter is too matronly because she carries herself stiffly. Nazimova’s
eyes are too large for her face and her head is too big. ”
·
“Pola
Negri – her face is too square. Mary Pickford shares the common
blemish of too large a head. ”
·
“Marie
Prevost’s neck is too short . Ruth Roland has a moon face and her
lips are too large .”
·
“Gloria
Swanson’s head is too heavy for her body.
Her nose is retrousse. ”
·
“Constance
Talmadge has an inadequate mouth and chin, Norma Talmadge has a bulbous nose.”
·
“Clair
Windsor’s eyes are set too high in her head. ”
And 1933,
published in the Montreal Gazette, November
17 1933:
·
Mae
West – “Her head, eyes and mouth were constructed for a simple nose, but nature
presented her with a complicated one – interestingly modelled, but bringing the
eyes too close together.”
Magazine cover by Stanlaws |
·
Katherine
Hepburn – “Her chin and the lower part of her face project too far.
Anthropologists have a name for such a facial type; they call it prognathism.
Artists call it ‘horsey’”.
·
Constance
Bennett – “A real symphony in jazz – her nose too small for her face.”
·
Greta
Garbo – “She has a sleepy, sophisticated look, attained by deep eye sockets and
a peculiar slant of the upper lip. These are not aids to beauty, but
schoolgirls find the effect more alluring than beauty.”
·
Jean
Harlow – “She has a graceful and expressive figure – between that of the ‘90s
and the boyish form. Her face is the same type as Katherine Hepburn’s, but more
so, caused by her nose projecting at too sharp an angle.”
·
Lupe
Velez – her, “figure is the ‘true maidenly’ one, he said, and her face is
mobile so she ‘can look sophisticated or innocent at will.’”
·
Ann
Harding – “Fine symmetrical features – but so nearly approaching the classic
type that repose of is essential to beauty.”
·
Kay
Francis - “Nicely-balanced features – head in fine proportion to body –
oversized triceps of the arms.”
·
Marlene
Dietrich – “Take Mary Pickford’s head, replace it with one slightly out of
drawing, give her heavy eyelids and sunken eyes and you have Dietrich – a sophisticated
Mary.”
·
Joan
Crawford and Joan Blondell – “have Mae West’s unusually prominent features, but
their ‘skull construction isn’t large enough to carry them.”
His comments
are obviously judgemental, negative, sometimes unclear and just plain rude. He
was evidently searching for a kind of superficial perfection that wasn’t
possible. I initially also found the comments slightly bigoted and outrageous as
he focused only on belittling the appearance of the female actors not their
male counterparts. However, now I believe his opinion to be useful for film
fans both now and then as he was highlighting (perhaps not in the best possible
way) the inherent imperfection of human beings whether they be actors or
accountants. Although, I prefer the words of Hollywood photographer, Clarence
Sinclair Bull, who said, “really pretty faces don’t seem to last [in the movie
mecca]…It’s the interesting faces that folks remember.”
What he was commenting on were problems photographically that needed to be addressed. He left no doubt, because esthetically, he had no doubt. . Everyone has issues with the camera. Or, nearly so.
ReplyDeleteThe solely thing want to|you should|you 우리카지노 have to} worry about is how you’re going to have fun your victory. Contact buyer help or an account manager at the on line casino for information on how greatest to handle your jackpot wins. The Wheel of Fortune Also known as The Big Six Wheel, The Big Six, or the Money Wheel, this sport of probability lets you wager on specific icons or symbols. However, most players don't see massive winnings, and the home edge for this sport is a whopping 16%.
ReplyDelete